Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 31
Filtrar
2.
J Am Coll Cardiol ; 83(15): 1489-1491, 2024 Apr 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38599720

Assuntos
Cardiologia , Humanos
6.
10.
J Am Coll Cardiol ; 82(13): 1373-1376, 2023 09 26.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37730294
12.
J Am Coll Cardiol ; 81(17): 1740-1742, 2023 05 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37100491
13.
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes ; 13(7): e006204, 2020 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32586105

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Catheterization laboratory (cath lab) activation time is a newly available process measure for patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction requiring inter-hospital transfers for primary percutaneous coronary intervention that reflects inter-facility communication and urgent mobilization of interventional laboratory resources. Our aim was to determine whether faster activation is associated with improved reperfusion time and outcomes in the American Heart Association Mission: Lifeline Accelerator-2 Project. METHODS AND RESULTS: From April 2015 to March 2017, treatment times of 2063 patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction requiring inter-hospital transfer for primary percutaneous coronary intervention from 12 regions around the United States were stratified by cath lab activation time (first hospital arrival to cath lab activation within [timely] or beyond 20 minutes [delayed]). Median cath lab activation time was 26 minutes, with a delayed activation observed in 1241 (60.2%) patients. Prior cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disease, arterial hypotension at admission, and black or Latino ethnicity were independent factors of delayed cath lab activation. Timely cath lab activation patients had shorter door-in door-out times (40 versus 68 minutes) and reperfusion times (98 versus 135 minutes) with 80.1% treated within the national goal of ≤120 minutes versus 39.0% in the delayed group. CONCLUSIONS: Cath lab activation within 20 minutes across a geographically diverse group of hospitals was associated with performing primary percutaneous coronary intervention within the national goal of ≤120 minutes in >75% of patients. While several confounding factors were associated with delayed activation, this work suggests that this process measure has the potential to direct resources and practices to more timely treatment of patients requiring inter-hospital transfer for primary percutaneous coronary intervention.


Assuntos
Cateterismo Cardíaco , Serviços Médicos de Emergência , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Transferência de Pacientes , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/terapia , Tempo para o Tratamento , Idoso , Cateterismo Cardíaco/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Melhoria de Qualidade , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/diagnóstico por imagem , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos
14.
Circulation ; 141(24): 2004-2025, 2020 06 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32539609

RESUMO

The 143 low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) of the world constitute 80% of the world's population or roughly 5.86 billion people with much variation in geography, culture, literacy, financial resources, access to health care, insurance penetration, and healthcare regulation. Unfortunately, their burden of cardiovascular disease in general and acute ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in particular is increasing at an unprecedented rate. Compounding the problem, outcomes remain suboptimal because of a lack of awareness and a severe paucity of resources. Guideline-based treatment has dramatically improved the outcomes of STEMI in high-income countries. However, no such focused recommendations exist for LMICs, and the unique challenges in LMICs make directly implementing Western guidelines unfeasible. Thus, structured solutions tailored to their individual, local needs, and resources are a vital need. With this in mind, a multicountry collaboration of investigators interested in LMIC STEMI care have tried to create a consensus document that extracts transferable elements from Western guidelines and couples them with local realities gathered from expert experience. It outlines general operating principles for LMICs focused best practices and is intended to create the broad outlines of implementable, resource-appropriate paradigms for management of STEMI in LMICs. Although this document is focused primarily on governments and organizations involved with improvement in STEMI care in LMICs, it also provides some specific targeted information for the frontline clinicians to allow standardized care pathways and improved outcomes.


Assuntos
Consenso , Países em Desenvolvimento/economia , Recursos em Saúde/economia , Pobreza/economia , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/economia , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/epidemiologia , Serviços Médicos de Emergência/economia , Serviços Médicos de Emergência/normas , Pessoal de Saúde/economia , Pessoal de Saúde/normas , Recursos em Saúde/normas , Humanos , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/economia , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/normas , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto/normas , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/terapia , Terapia Trombolítica/economia , Terapia Trombolítica/normas
18.
Circulation ; 137(4): 376-387, 2018 01 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29138292

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Regional variations in reperfusion times and mortality in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction are influenced by differences in coordinating care between emergency medical services (EMS) and hospitals. Building on the Accelerator-1 Project, we hypothesized that time to reperfusion could be further reduced with enhanced regional efforts. METHODS: Between April 2015 and March 2017, we worked with 12 metropolitan regions across the United States with 132 percutaneous coronary intervention-capable hospitals and 946 EMS agencies. Data were collected in the ACTION (Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network)-Get With The Guidelines Registry for quarterly Mission: Lifeline reports. The primary end point was the change in the proportion of EMS-transported patients with first medical contact to device time ≤90 minutes from baseline to final quarter. We also compared treatment times and mortality with patients treated in hospitals not participating in the project during the corresponding time period. RESULTS: During the study period, 10 730 patients were transported to percutaneous coronary intervention-capable hospitals, including 974 in the baseline quarter and 972 in the final quarter who met inclusion criteria. Median age was 61 years; 27% were women, 6% had cardiac arrest, and 6% had shock on admission; 10% were black, 12% were Latino, and 10% were uninsured. By the end of the intervention, all process measures reflecting coordination between EMS and hospitals had improved, including the proportion of patients with a first medical contact to device time of ≤90 minutes (67%-74%; P<0.002), a first medical contact to device time to catheterization laboratory activation of ≤20 minutes (38%-56%; P<0.0001), and emergency department dwell time of ≤20 minutes (33%-43%; P<0.0001). Of the 12 regions, 9 regions reduced first medical contact to device time, and 8 met or exceeded the national goal of 75% of patients treated in ≤90 minutes. Improvements in treatment times corresponded with a significant reduction in mortality (in-hospital death, 4.4%-2.3%; P=0.001) that was not apparent in hospitals not participating in the project during the same time period. CONCLUSIONS: Organization of care among EMS and hospitals in 12 regions was associated with significant reductions in time to reperfusion in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction as well as in in-hospital mortality. These findings support a more intensive regional approach to emergency care for patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction.


Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Cardiologia/organização & administração , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/organização & administração , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/organização & administração , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/organização & administração , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Regionalização da Saúde/organização & administração , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/cirurgia , Tempo para o Tratamento/organização & administração , Transporte de Pacientes/organização & administração , Idoso , Feminino , Hospitalização , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/mortalidade , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Sistema de Registros , Fatores de Risco , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/diagnóstico , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/mortalidade , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/fisiopatologia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos
19.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 6(10)2017 Oct 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29066448

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The American Heart Association Mission: Lifeline STEMI (ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction) Systems Accelerator program, conducted in 16 regions across the United States to improve key care processes, resulted in more patients being treated within national guideline goals (time from first medical contact to device: <90 minutes for direct presenters to hospitals capable of performing percutaneous coronary intervention; <120 minutes for transfers). We examined whether the effort reduced reperfusion disparities in the proportions of female versus male and black versus white patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: In total, 23 809 patients (29.3% female, 82.3% white, and 10.7% black) presented with acute STEMI between July 2012 and March 2014. Change in the proportion of patients treated within guideline goals was compared between sex and race subgroups for patients presenting directly to hospitals capable of performing percutaneous coronary intervention (n=18 267) and patients requiring transfer (n=5542). The intervention was associated with an increase in the proportion of men treated within guideline goals that presented directly (58.7-62.1%, P=0.01) or were transferred (43.3-50.7%, P<0.01). An increase was also seen among white patients who presented directly (57.7-59.9%, P=0.02) or were transferred (43.9-48.8%, P<0.01). There was no change in the proportion of female or black patients treated within guideline goals, including both those presenting directly and transferred. CONCLUSION: The STEMI Systems Accelerator project was associated with an increase in the proportion of patients meeting guideline reperfusion targets for male and white patients but not for female or black patients. Efforts to organize systems of STEMI care should implement additional processes targeting barriers to timely reperfusion among female and black patients.


Assuntos
Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/etnologia , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/terapia , Negro ou Afro-Americano , Acesso aos Serviços de Saúde , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/etnologia , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Padrões de Prática Médica , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/etnologia , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/terapia , População Branca , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/diagnóstico , Idoso , Feminino , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Acesso aos Serviços de Saúde/tendências , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/tendências , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Transferência de Pacientes , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/tendências , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Fatores de Risco , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/diagnóstico , Fatores Sexuais , Fatores de Tempo , Tempo para o Tratamento , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
20.
Circ Cardiovasc Interv ; 10(1)2017 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28082714

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The Mission: Lifeline STEMI Systems Accelerator program, implemented in 16 US metropolitan regions, resulted in more patients receiving timely reperfusion. We assessed whether implementing key care processes was associated with system performance improvement. METHODS AND RESULTS: Hospitals (n=167 with 23 498 ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction patients) were surveyed before (March 2012) and after (July 2014) program intervention. Data were merged with patient-level clinical data over the same period. For reperfusion, hospitals were grouped by whether a specific process of care was implemented, preexisting, or never implemented. Uptake of 4 key care processes increased after intervention: prehospital catheterization laboratory activation (62%-91%; P<0.001), single call transfer protocol from an outside facility (45%-70%; P<0.001), and emergency department bypass for emergency medical services direct presenters (48%-59%; P=0.002) and transfers (56%-79%; P=0.001). There were significant differences in median first medical contact-to-device times among groups implementing prehospital activation (88 minutes implementers versus 89 minutes preexisting versus 98 minutes nonimplementers; P<0.001 for comparisons). Similarly, patients treated at hospitals implementing single call transfer protocols had shorter median first medical contact-to-device times (112 versus 128 versus 152 minutes; P<0.001). Emergency department bypass was also associated with shorter median first medical contact-to-device times for emergency medical services direct presenters (84 versus 88 versus 94 minutes; P<0.001) and transfers (123 versus 127 versus 167 minutes; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The Accelerator program increased uptake of key care processes, which were associated with improved system performance. These findings support efforts to implement regional ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction networks focused on prehospital catheterization laboratory activation, single call transfer protocols, and emergency department bypass.


Assuntos
Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/organização & administração , Reperfusão Miocárdica/métodos , Avaliação de Processos em Cuidados de Saúde/organização & administração , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/terapia , Tempo para o Tratamento/organização & administração , Cateterismo Cardíaco , Serviço Hospitalar de Cardiologia/organização & administração , Procedimentos Clínicos/organização & administração , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/normas , Serviços Médicos de Emergência/organização & administração , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/organização & administração , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Reperfusão Miocárdica/efeitos adversos , Reperfusão Miocárdica/mortalidade , Reperfusão Miocárdica/normas , Transferência de Pacientes/organização & administração , Avaliação de Processos em Cuidados de Saúde/normas , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Melhoria de Qualidade , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde , Sistema de Registros , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/diagnóstico , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/mortalidade , Fatores de Tempo , Tempo para o Tratamento/normas , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...